A Guide to AI Security Posture Management (AISPM)
GenAI has gone from “interesting experiment” to “embedded in every ...
Few environments match the scale and scrutiny of federal IT. Every agency, contractor, and mission system operates under constant pressure to defend sensitive data while maintaining seamless public services.
In 2023, U.S. federal agencies reported 32,211 information security incidents, encompassing a range of incidents, from data leaks to ransomware and insider threats. Among those, 11 major breaches affected multiple agencies and compromised sensitive data across critical government systems.
These statistics depict a reality that every agency and contractor must confront daily: the federal attack surface is vast, interconnected, and continuously targeted. That’s why compliance frameworks, such as the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA), exist to bring order, structure, and accountability to that landscape.
This guide explains what FISMA encompasses, to whom it applies, and how its requirements impact data security governance. We’ll also explore how FISMA aligns with FedRAMP and list the best practices agencies and contractors should prioritize to stay compliant—and resilient—in 2025.
What is FISMA?
The Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is U.S. federal legislation that delivers a broad mandate for federal agencies, and by extension, their contractors and service providers. Its purpose is to manage information security risks across systems that support government operations.
Although the original act (the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002) was enacted in 2002, the 2014 modernization made a big difference in strengthening oversight and responsibilities.
Under FISMA, agencies must develop, document, and implement agency-wide information security programs; evaluate risks; implement controls; and continuously monitor their information systems.
In short, FISMA is the foundational federal law that creates the framework for federal information system security.
Who Needs to Follow FISMA?
FISMA primarily applies to federal executive branch agencies and their information systems.
But the reach of FISMA goes well beyond just internal government agencies:
- Federal agencies must comply directly, both for the systems they operate and those they acquire.
- Contractors, vendors, service providers, and other non-federal entities that operate, support, or manage information systems on behalf of a federal agency are also within FISMA’s scope.
- Even if an organization is not a federal agency, if it handles or processes federal information (or supports a system for a federal agency), FISMA obligations may still apply.
So, if your organization provides services to U.S. federal agencies, stores or processes federal data, or supports a federally controlled information system, you should assume FISMA applies to you.
What Are the Core FISMA Requirements in 2025?
While many of the core requirements refer to earlier versions of the law and implementing guidance, the current environment places huge importance on risk-based management, continuous monitoring, alignment with NIST standards, and measurable maturity.
Here are the key requirements you need to be aware of.
1. Risk-based information security program
Agencies must adopt a comprehensive information security program that:
- Includes periodic assessments of risk (threats, vulnerabilities, impact) to organizational operations, assets, individuals, and other entities.
- Implements controls tailored to the risk assessment.
- Builds in accountability, roles, and responsibilities (for senior agency officials, CIOs, and program officials).
2. Categorization of information systems
FISMA requires agencies to categorize systems using FIPS 199 based on potential impact levels (low, moderate, high) for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
3. Selection, implementation, and assessment of security controls
Agencies must select security controls from the catalog in NIST Special Publication 800‑53 (Revision 5) and related guidance.
Once selected, controls must be implemented and then assessed (through audit or test) to validate that they’re working as intended.
4. Continuous monitoring
FISMA emphasizes that authorization (Authority to Operate) should not be a one-and-done exercise. Security posture must be regularly monitored, metrics gathered, incidents managed, and controls reassessed.
5. Reporting and metrics
Agencies must submit annual reports on their information security programs to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Congress. Inspectors general assess these reports based on specific metrics.
6. Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Information systems must obtain an agency authorization to operate (ATO), which verifies that the system’s risk level is acceptable. Systems cannot operate indefinitely without this authorization.
How Does FISMA Fit into Data Security Governance?
From a governance perspective, FISMA plays a crucial role in federal information systems management.
Here’s how it fits in with other governance activities:
- Framework alignment: FISMA sets the law; implementing agencies use NIST frameworks (e.g., SP 800-37 RMF, SP 800-53 controls) to execute.
- Risk management: The focus here is not only on compliance but on managing cyber risk, where agencies must understand their risk posture and make decisions accordingly.
- Oversight and accountability: Senior management has clearly defined roles under FISMA.
- Continuous improvement and monitoring: Governance teams must ensure the system doesn’t remain static, which means that as threats evolve, security controls must evolve accordingly.
- Integration across enterprise: Because agencies rely on networks, contractors, third parties, and cloud services, FISMA governance must account for both internal and external interfaces.
Think of FISMA as the foundation, with governance mechanisms creating the structure, controls, and culture around it.
How Does FISMA compare to the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP)?
It is common to confuse FISMA and FedRAMP; they share objectives but differ in scope, approach, and applicability. Below is a side-by-side comparison.
Key takeaway
If you’re a federal agency or a contractor supporting a federal agency’s internal system, your compliance path is under FISMA. If you’re a cloud service provider offering services to one or many federal agencies, you’ll likely need FedRAMP on top of FISMA-like controls.
In many cases, achieving FedRAMP authorization will satisfy many FISMA obligations, but one does not necessarily substitute for the other.
Best Practices for FISMA Compliance in 2025 and How Concentric AI Helps
To maintain and demonstrate compliance under FISMA, these actionable best practices can go a long way.
- Classify your data and systems early
Use impact-level (low, moderate, high) categorization to prioritize control selection and resources. Clear classification helps agencies understand which data truly matters—and where it resides.
Concentric AI’s Semantic Intelligence automatically discovers and classifies both structured and unstructured data across cloud, on-prem, and SaaS environments. It understands the context of sensitive data—such as PII, PHI, or CUI—and maps it for compliance purposes. - Align with NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5
Ensure you’re using the latest control catalog, applied specifically to your risk environment. - Implement a culture of continuous monitoring
Compliance cannot stop at assessment—it must operate in real time. Continuous monitoring tracks data movement, control effectiveness, and risk changes as they occur.
Semantic Intelligence automates continuous visibility into data posture by detecting anomalous sharing, access drift, and exposure of sensitive records across systems. AI-driven risk scoring highlights policy violations and security gaps that could jeopardize your authority to operate (ATO). That allows agencies to act quickly, before incidents turn into reportable breaches. - Document everything
Policies, system security plans (SSPs), control implementation, and assessment are all crucial pieces of the audit and reporting puzzle.
Semantic Intelligence generates comprehensive, exportable audit evidence for where sensitive data resides, who has access to it, and how it is protected. - Engage senior leadership and define accountability
Ensure that your CIO, CISO, program officials, and contractors understand their roles within the information security program. - Vendor/third-party management
Every external connection introduces risk. Federal supply chain oversight now requires agencies and contractors to understand how partners handle federal data.
Semantic Intelligence monitors sensitive data shared externally via collaboration tools and SaaS platforms. It identifies when files or records are exposed to unauthorized users—including third-party domains—and automatically flags risky permissions. - Incident response planning and resilience
Preparedness is a key indicator of the speed of recovery. Agencies must have tested incident response and disaster recovery processes that align with NIST SP 800-61.
Semantic Intelligence accelerates investigation by discovering which sensitive data was exposed or exfiltrated during a breach. Automated lineage tracking reduces the time spent identifying affected records, supporting faster containment, reporting, and remediation within federal timelines. - Use metrics and maturity models
The FY 2024 IG FISMA Metrics guide offers maturity levels beyond “ad-hoc”. Leverage this to raise your posture.
The Semantic Intelligence dashboard aligns with FISMA and NIST CSF maturity categories to help agencies quantify progress toward higher maturity levels. - Integrate cloud and hybrid system oversight
Most federal environments now mix on-prem and cloud systems. Governance must account for sensitive data moving across both.
Semantic Intelligence provides unified data security governance across SaaS, IaaS, and on-prem systems—automatically discovering new data stores and securing regulated data wherever it travels. - Stay updated with regulatory changes
FISMA, NIST guidance, and OMB memos evolve continuously. Staying current prevents compliance drift.
With an AI-driven inventory of sensitive data and contextual risk, Semantic Intelligence makes adapting to new control mandates faster. Updates to NIST or OMB policies can be mapped directly to existing data categories and risk reports, ensuring continuous compliance rather than a reactive approach.
Where FISMA Meets Data Intelligence
The FISMA compliance journey is a structured process of good governance, risk management, control selection, monitoring, and continuous improvement.
Put another way, FISMA compliance can only succeed with accurate visibility, contextual understanding, and continuous enforcement. By combining AI-powered data discovery with automated risk detection and audit-ready intelligence, agencies and contractors can meet federal expectations in 2025 and remain confident in their ability to do so in 2026.